You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following on from an email conversation with Rob Warren...
Me:What I didn’t find was the concept of markers. These are labelled metal stakes that represent a person buried in a grave. Is that catered for?
Rob: Good point. Please create a github ticket requesting a "Marker" or "Stake" class. In the current ontology, the top-level class for this is a "Monument". Do you think that "CommemorationObject" would be a better superclass or is a metal stakes a Monument?
In some cemeteries a marker is used to identify each person buried in a grave. Markers are sometimes a stake pushed into the ground beside the grave, or sometimes embedded into the grave surrounds.
In my experience, a Marker identifies one, and only one, person's remains in a grave - there may be different practices followed elsewhere.
I'll open a separate issue regarding the "Monument" or "CommemorationObject" superclass question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Following on from an email conversation with Rob Warren...
In some cemeteries a marker is used to identify each person buried in a grave. Markers are sometimes a stake pushed into the ground beside the grave, or sometimes embedded into the grave surrounds.
In my experience, a Marker identifies one, and only one, person's remains in a grave - there may be different practices followed elsewhere.
I'll open a separate issue regarding the "Monument" or "CommemorationObject" superclass question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: