How do you represent the fact that a cemetery changed its name? #41
Replies: 4 comments
-
The thing and the name of the thing are different things. Most of the examples in the ontology use siteName (#23) or rdfs:label, both of which keep people happy with simplicity but don't deal well with changes to appellation. The nearest property to "also known as" is skos:altLabel which doesn't give you temporal data but is easy to search; this is also what Wikidata is using: In this case are you trying to deal with its change in legal organization, something like the W3 Organization Ontology or FIBO are the answer but that might be overkill. Graves imports the TIME Ontology and aligns it with the PROV Ontology as per the recommended statements for temporal data. skos-xl provides a basis for a label-as-an-instance but restricts the skos-xl:literalForm property to a singleton which annoyingly prevents multilingual applications. Thus my suggestion is that I create a new class called graves:FeatureName that is a prov:Activity (subclassed from time:TemporalEntity) and a skos-xl:Label. This example is in verbose xml/rdf but you get the idea:
Two items of import here:
SPARQL and XSD have very specific ideas about how to evaluate truncated representation and not all Inferenceable time comparisons will be resolvable using the partial data that you have, but it fixes most of your day to day problems such as ordering and name display. Any thoughts? PS: There can only be one skos-xl#literalForm per skos-xl:Label because of an owl:Restriction which causes problems for multilingual applications. This is at odds with S14: "A resource has no more than one value of skos:prefLabel per language tag". In this case, I'm simply using multiple rdfs:label properties. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Current thinking:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for your very detailed reply. As someone new to linked data, I do not feel qualified to comment on what might be a good solution but what you describe using Time and Prov seems very powerful. I suspect my contributions will be limited to raising issues, questions, and test cases. I'm sorry I can't be more helpful on implementations. I'll continue my learning so perhaps I may be able to contribute in a more meaningful way. Due to my lack of research, I'm not sure if this example is an alias, simple name change, or something more significant in the operations of the Cemetery (e.g. change in Administrating body - which did happen but I'm not sure if the name change is linked to that event). I'll continue my research to try clarify. At the moment, I'm leaning towards an alias, until I find some evidence. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
OK. skos:altLabel is the way to go for you then. I'm going to create the TemporalName in v1.5 to fix a few other corner cases. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The
Brisbane General Cemetery
changed its name toToowong Cemetery
. I'm still trying to find the date of the name change.How is this best represented?
Should there be, either:
one cemetery record with an "also known as" property and value ("also known as" is used on the Toowong Cemetery Wikidata entry)
two cemetery records,
Brisbane General Cemetery
from 1871 to ????, andToowong Cemetery
from ???? to null endDateIf the answer is 1., then is an "also known as" property needed on Dead-people-place?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions