You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
to the DBNet class, add a parameter use_binary_map: bool = False the model should behave the same as before when use_binary_map is False, but compute the "binarized map" described in the DBNet paper and return it in the outs["preds"]
e.g. if use_binary_map is True, the following code should be executed in a forward pass:
An qualitative analysis of some receipts showed me, that the bin_map seemed more robust than the currently used prob_map and quantitative analysis showed an improvement in the CER (-0.5%) and WER (-1.4%), giving us an improvement at the cost of little additional computational needs.
Alternatives
No response
Additional context
An example of my qualitative analysis:
showing some spots where the prob_map is less confident on some spots while the bin_map marks the region better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
🚀 The feature
to the
DBNet
class, add a parameteruse_binary_map: bool = False
the model should behave the same as before whenuse_binary_map
is False, but compute the "binarized map" described in the DBNet paper and return it in theouts["preds"]
e.g. if use_binary_map is True, the following code should be executed in a forward pass:
Motivation, pitch
An qualitative analysis of some receipts showed me, that the
bin_map
seemed more robust than the currently usedprob_map
and quantitative analysis showed an improvement in the CER (-0.5%) and WER (-1.4%), giving us an improvement at the cost of little additional computational needs.Alternatives
No response
Additional context
An example of my qualitative analysis:
showing some spots where the prob_map is less confident on some spots while the bin_map marks the region better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: