Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make progress bar more informative #8

Open
mihaiconstantin opened this issue Apr 29, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Make progress bar more informative #8

mihaiconstantin opened this issue Apr 29, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mihaiconstantin
Copy link
Owner

mihaiconstantin commented Apr 29, 2022

The idea would be to have a progress bar per method step (i.e., StepOne and StepThree) instead of a single progress bar fixed based on the number of method iterations.

@mihaiconstantin mihaiconstantin self-assigned this Apr 29, 2022
@mihaiconstantin mihaiconstantin added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 29, 2022
@mihaiconstantin mihaiconstantin moved this from Backlog to Todo in powerly Apr 29, 2022
@mihaiconstantin mihaiconstantin moved this from Todo to In Progress in powerly Sep 28, 2022
@mihaiconstantin
Copy link
Owner Author

This proved more complicated than I thought. I propose an implementation based on my StackOverflow answer, but with permanent R sessions instead of short-lived R processes. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/73940644/5252007 for the gist of it.

@mihaiconstantin
Copy link
Owner Author

mihaiconstantin commented Oct 7, 2022

For macOS, we may run into problems setting up a PSOCK cluster with the parallel setup strategy. See this question on https://stackoverflow.com/q/73962109/5252007.

@mihaiconstantin mihaiconstantin added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Oct 7, 2022
@mihaiconstantin
Copy link
Owner Author

The macOS issue is solved by r-lib/processx@1082c9d (i.e., see r-lib/callr#236 for details).

@mihaiconstantin mihaiconstantin removed the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Oct 8, 2022
@mihaiconstantin
Copy link
Owner Author

Switching to the parabar package for parallelization and progress tracking. Waiting for mihaiconstantin/parabar#12 to be completed before releasing powerly with parabar.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant