You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I do not understand num_non_zero_entries.
For a R1CS instance defined via matrices A,B,C, num_non_zero_entries refers to which matrix?
It appears to be essential for the runtime of SNARK proof.
how can I determine it for a given R1CS instance (generated with NOVA for example)
what happens if it is set to a value that is larger than the actual number of non-zeros
what happens if it is set to a value that is smaller than the actual number of non-zeros
can it be abstracted away s.t. we do not have to think about this argument any longer?
why is it not relevant for the NIZK prover?
Thanks for this great project!
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
R1CS instance is a 7-tuple: $(\mathbb{F}, A, B, C, \bf{io}, m, n)$, where $A, B, C$ are $m\times m$ matrices. num_non_zero_entries is actually the n in the R1CS instance, which dipct the sparsity and density of polynomials encoded by these matrices. When you get $A, B, C$ matrices, you can count the non-zero entries of the three matrices and define num_non_zero_entries with the max.
I do not understand
num_non_zero_entries
.For a R1CS instance defined via matrices A,B,C,
num_non_zero_entries
refers to which matrix?It appears to be essential for the runtime of SNARK proof.
can it be abstracted away s.t. we do not have to think about this argument any longer?NIZK
prover?Thanks for this great project!
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: