Docs should display a return type for World:get()

[lolmanurfunny]

Description

The documentation for World:get() is missing a return type. See World:remove() for reference.

Steps to reproduce

Go to the documentation.

[jackTabsCode]

Where are you not seeing the return type?

The ... indicates that a variable number of arguments can be passed to the function. In this case, it'd be Component(s). It then shows ... for the return type, indicating you receive back to the components you pass.

The only thing I'd note is that you actually get instance(s) of a Component, and you pass the Component constructor(s), but most users have understood this so far.

[LastTalon]

There is definitely room for improvement in the docs with this sort of thing. I don't think it's the only instance, but part of what the docs signatures need to do is convey an intuitive understanding of what the functions do.

I wouldn't be opposed to people grooming the docs for things like this.

[lolmanurfunny]

Sorry if the intent of this issue wasn't immediately clear. I'm just pointing out this minute inconsistency.

:get()

:remove()

[jackTabsCode]

I think the distinction between a component constructor and a component should be made more clear in the docs. There's a page that explains it, but immediately starts describing "patch" as a method on the constructor which doesn't make sense.