You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It takes much longer time to run the multicomponent (NiCrAl) precipitation example using my database than the provided NiCrAl.tdb.
What could be the reasons for making the calculaiton efficiency very different? Do you have any suggestions on how to make the simulation faster?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since this issue was brought up before kawin 0.3.0, you could try updating kawin to see if that helps since there were quite a few changes in how the models are solved
You could use the thermodynamics class directly rather than the surrogate, using model.setThermodynamics(therm) and skipping the surrogate section in the example. If the surrogates don't match the underlying thermodynamics that well, it's possible to get non-physical values which can affect the simulation.
If you want to use the surrogates, you could try increasing the density of points or expanding the composition range it's trained on
If neither of these options work, it would be helpful if you're able to share the TDB file. It's possible that the thermodynamic models in the TDB file result in largely different driving forces compared to the TDB file used in the example which can affect how the precipitation model is solved. Being able to look at the TDB file could give some insight into why you're seeing the time differences.
It takes much longer time to run the multicomponent (NiCrAl) precipitation example using my database than the provided NiCrAl.tdb.
What could be the reasons for making the calculaiton efficiency very different? Do you have any suggestions on how to make the simulation faster?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: