You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Your paper mentioned some dirty training data of Piccolo that led to low test-time accuracy for Piccolo sounds. Do you think removing the problematic training data and training the model again will be a good idea?
The current model really learned to do two things: A) estimate pitch, B) if the instrument is classified as Piccolo, do a weird thing.
If we fix the dataset, the model won't have to learn a wrong thing anymore, which probably benefits its performance on other instruments too. Maybe then you will be able to decrease the model size without sacrificing accuracy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Your paper mentioned some dirty training data of Piccolo that led to low test-time accuracy for Piccolo sounds. Do you think removing the problematic training data and training the model again will be a good idea?
The current model really learned to do two things: A) estimate pitch, B) if the instrument is classified as Piccolo, do a weird thing.
If we fix the dataset, the model won't have to learn a wrong thing anymore, which probably benefits its performance on other instruments too. Maybe then you will be able to decrease the model size without sacrificing accuracy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: