Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use for plant mitochondria annotation #159

Open
sanyalab opened this issue Sep 7, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Use for plant mitochondria annotation #159

sanyalab opened this issue Sep 7, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@sanyalab
Copy link

sanyalab commented Sep 7, 2022

Hello,

Can this software be used to annotate plant mitochondria as well? If so, any tweaks required in the software? What are the drawbacks in calling plant mito genes.

Thanks
Abhijit

@linzhi2013
Copy link
Owner

Hi Abhijit,

thanks for your question!

MitoZ is designed for animal mitogenomes.

Have you tried https://dogma.ccbb.utexas.edu/ ?

@sanyalab
Copy link
Author

Hello Lin,

I am aware that MitoZ is designed for animal mitogenomes. I am asking whether it has the capability of working on plant mitochondria as well. Do you see any pitfalls or drawbacks in doing this?

Thanks
Abhijit

@linzhi2013
Copy link
Owner

Hi Abhijit,

basically, many genes will be missing, as plant mitogenomes have different gene content compared to animal mitogenomes. For example, the rRNA CM models and tRNA profiles were trained with animal mitogenome data.

@sanyalab
Copy link
Author

Hi Lin,

Thank you for the reply. Lets say for ncRNA and tRNA I use a seperate tool like infernal and tRNAscan-SE. For protein-coding gene prediction do you forsee any major issues? Like are you using models trained on animal protein-coding genes?

I only ask because I found your tool is easy to implement. Therefore, if I can tweak the gene models or prepare new ones, I can adapt this for plants.

Thanks
Abhijit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants