You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using slices of NCBI's NT database for pacbio hifi read mapping. I noticed that the number of minimizers seems to have overflowed the integer count. Would you expect this to impact the trustworthiness of the mapping results, or is this just a cosmetic issue in the stderr reporting?
prior mapping run with nt_others, number of minimizers are positive and percentages are < 100
[M::mm_idx_stat::128.816*2.87] distinct minimizers: 232724554 (61.91% are singletons); average occurrences: 2.649; average spacing: 10.138; total length: 6250598365
mapping nt_prok, number of minimizers are negative
[M::mm_idx_stat::4819.440*3.47] distinct minimizers: -814309831 (-245.31% are singletons); average occurrences: -30.207; average spacing: 10.032; total length: 246767835107
I believe that I am using the latest current release [M::main] Version: 2.28-r1209
Thank you,
Cameron
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @lh3,
I'm using slices of NCBI's NT database for pacbio hifi read mapping. I noticed that the number of minimizers seems to have overflowed the integer count. Would you expect this to impact the trustworthiness of the mapping results, or is this just a cosmetic issue in the stderr reporting?
prior mapping run with nt_others, number of minimizers are positive and percentages are < 100
mapping nt_prok, number of minimizers are negative
I believe that I am using the latest current release
[M::main] Version: 2.28-r1209
Thank you,
Cameron
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: