-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Just a Question #36
Comments
Hi @daxgames you are correct. I install more things than just vim stuff. They're most terminal related but not nvim related. A reason for using brew on linux is it being agnostic of which flavor or linux you have and also working with macos, so it's less work to maintain it here, and i will work if you use arch, debian, or whatever ;) Also, brew tends to keep packages more up to date than official packages from, say, Ubuntu. I install this dotfiles first thing when installing a new system, so my Firefox will usually be the one from Brew and I won't install it from any other source anyway, so I don't have that problem you mentioned. Hope that helped |
Yeah I was aware of the more current versions provided by Homebrew. I am not always in full control of the machines I work with so the included Brewfile can be installing duplicate stuff. |
Unfortunately I am also forced to work with WSL v1 in SOME CASES and it does not play nice with Homebrew. I have jumped in with both feet and created a combined fork of skwp/dotfiles and lfilho/dotfiles that does both Differences from lfilho/dotfiles and skwp/dotfiles:
|
@lfilho I am getting back to trying out your fork of skwp/dotfiles via my own fork of your work. I am looking at it more critically and that has generated some questions.
You seem to be using this repo as more of an all encompassing workstation setup vs. terminal configuration framework like skwp/dotfiles.
Would that be a fair assessment?
I ask this because the
Brewfile
seems to install A LOT of stuff that is not terminal related, or is the extra software somehow used by thenvim
plugins.It really does more than I want and was wondering if I remove most of the stuff from the
Brewfile
in my fork if I was going to break a bunch of stuff.If I chose to modify the
Brewfile
and continued to use it on bothMacOS
andLinux
what would be the bare minimumBrewfile
without breaking things?I included
tmux
above because I compile it onLinux
and do not use the native package anyway.I was even looking at the possibility of reverting to not even using
brew
unless it was onMacOS
and leaving theBrewfile
alone since I install most of that stuff onMacOS
usingbrew
already. I would probably just create a function in theRakefile
to install thenvim
requirements if the OS wereLinux
.I don't know, it just seems odd to me to use
Homebrew
onLinux
instead of the native package managers that are already there. I'm not sure how I feel about how it creates a whole separate filesystem tree with stuff it installs and that I can end up with Firefox from both native package manager andHomebrew
.Am I over thinking this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: