Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[question]use different rules to assign runway in use #7

Open
tgpetrica opened this issue Nov 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[question]use different rules to assign runway in use #7

tgpetrica opened this issue Nov 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tgpetrica
Copy link

Hello,

I was thinking of implementing this at the local level, but it would be insufficient considering the complexity of the way in which the runways is chosen in the service.

For instance, in my local vACC we assign runway in use based on different rules:

  1. wind: some runways could be used with a tailwind / crosswind component up to 6 knots, while other runways can accept up to 12 knots;
  2. runway in use at other nearest airport: To elaborate here, we have the situation where, at one airport, a direction is used approximately parallel and sloghtly same direction to that from other airport: LROP 08 (means LRBS 07), LROP 26 ( means LRBS 25)
  3. parallel operations: There would be more to talk about here, as there are many possible configurations

So, what would interest me is if there is the possibility of expanding the current application to be able to set the maximum tailwind per airport (no_factor_wind) or for several airports in the same group.

And it would also be the case that bases on the airport /airspace config can be set for some airports, even if that would also mean opposite directions for operating at low traffic flow. (For example, runway 11 used for departures, while runway 29 used for landings.)

@laxentis
Copy link
Owner

Sure thing. Sounds like good ideas. It should be pretty straight-forward to allow no_factor_wind to be configurable per-airport. Also selected runways affecting runway choices should also be doable.

@laxentis laxentis self-assigned this Nov 18, 2024
@laxentis
Copy link
Owner

I've added per airport configurable no_factor_wind in 03f9fc0. Am thinking about extending it further down to runways. With the planned rewrite of runway assignment order (#3) it could simplify runway assignment logic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants