Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add kubernetes-security@daocloud.io to distributors-announce list #5361

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

add kubernetes-security@daocloud.io to distributors-announce list #5361

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pacoxu
Copy link
Member

@pacoxu pacoxu commented Jun 5, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Fixes kubernetes/committee-security-response#180

I add all information in the issue description.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. area/access Define who has access to what via IAM bindings, role bindings, policy, etc. area/groups Google Groups management, code in groups/ labels Jun 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from enj June 5, 2023 07:24
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the committee/security-response Denotes an issue or PR intended to be handled by the product security committee. label Jun 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 5, 2023
@pacoxu pacoxu mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2023
Open
1 task
@pacoxu
Copy link
Member Author

pacoxu commented Jun 6, 2023

/cc @kubernetes/security-response-committee

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pacoxu: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: kubernetes/security-response-committee.

Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

/cc @kubernetes/security-response-committee

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member Author

pacoxu commented Jun 21, 2023

/cc @ritazh @micahhausler

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member Author

pacoxu commented Aug 28, 2023

ack

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member Author

pacoxu commented Sep 18, 2023

/cc @justaugustus

@ritazh
Copy link
Member

ritazh commented Sep 18, 2023

@enj PTAL

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

@kubernetes/security-response-committee – Bump for review.

I'm not part of the SRC, so:
/uncc

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the request for review from justaugustus November 18, 2023 18:25
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 16, 2024
@pacoxu
Copy link
Member Author

pacoxu commented Feb 18, 2024

@kubernetes/security-response-committee – Bump for review.

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pacoxu
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign micahhausler for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member Author

pacoxu commented May 9, 2024

/assign @enj
Any action items that I can do for this?

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member Author

pacoxu commented Aug 5, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@enj @kubernetes/security-response-committee
any update on this progress? ACK.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 3, 2024
@pacoxu
Copy link
Member Author

pacoxu commented Nov 4, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@enj @kubernetes/security-response-committee
any update on this progress? ACK.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@enj enj Awaiting requested review from enj

@tabbysable tabbysable Awaiting requested review from tabbysable

@micahhausler micahhausler Awaiting requested review from micahhausler

@ritazh ritazh Awaiting requested review from ritazh

Assignees

@enj enj

Labels
area/access Define who has access to what via IAM bindings, role bindings, policy, etc. area/groups Google Groups management, code in groups/ cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. committee/security-response Denotes an issue or PR intended to be handled by the product security committee. sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

private-distributors-list: add DaoCloud
6 participants
@pacoxu @k8s-ci-robot @ritazh @justaugustus @k8s-triage-robot @enj