Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring Jim for an easier adoption for production in LVK #10

Closed
7 of 10 tasks
kazewong opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #27
Closed
7 of 10 tasks

Refactoring Jim for an easier adoption for production in LVK #10

kazewong opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #27
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@kazewong
Copy link
Owner

kazewong commented May 12, 2023

Currently Jim is still in its adolescent stage, which it is usable and energetic but it is not very social and user friendly. To make Jim to be usable and more importantly hired by the community, we need to refactor Jim to have a cleaner API with some features useful for productions runs in the future.

Note that on the top level, while we want to be as user-friendly and modular as possible, this should not come with a cost to performance.

Here is a preliminary list of features needed for the refactoring and next release:

This should be the development main branch where the aforementioned features can be branched off from.

@kazewong kazewong added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels May 12, 2023
@kazewong kazewong added this to the Refactoring for production milestone May 12, 2023
@thomasckng thomasckng moved this to Done in Jim-v1.0.0 Jul 23, 2024
@thomasckng thomasckng removed the status in Jim-v1.0.0 Jul 23, 2024
@thomasckng thomasckng removed this from Jim-v1.0.0 Jul 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants