You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Although the original intent was to keep a monolithic assembly, it does complicate things if we want to introduce mg-desktop (that builds on top of the same common core) into the mix, which hampers our re-usability story which would be restricted down to source-compatibility.
So despite the initial rejection of preserving the split-assembly idea, we should at least try to see if it is possible at a minimum to split off the (Foundation, Geometry, PlatformBase) parts of the MapGuide API and have the (MapGuideCommon, WebSupport, WebApp) part depend on it in another assembly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Although the original intent was to keep a monolithic assembly, it does complicate things if we want to introduce mg-desktop (that builds on top of the same common core) into the mix, which hampers our re-usability story which would be restricted down to source-compatibility.
So despite the initial rejection of preserving the split-assembly idea, we should at least try to see if it is possible at a minimum to split off the (Foundation, Geometry, PlatformBase) parts of the MapGuide API and have the (MapGuideCommon, WebSupport, WebApp) part depend on it in another assembly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: