You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
using unique, hardcoded characters for each list item, and then an ambiguous ending character is breaking my content. I'd like to change this syntax to a single character syntax.
the number sign, #, would make the most sense to me, since we're numbering things. this would make for an easy fix with nesting ordered lists, because then we could use multiple markers for list depth.
related: # [ ]
~~
bug: heading syntax uses a number symbol, instead of a portion symbol
percentage is a portion calculated in terms of the rest of the portions, but it's the closest general character I can find to indicate a portion
the only other one I can think of is + a plus sign, but that's part of the problem I'm trying to solve. I would like to better organize content across documents for a combinatorial value whose mechanisms work differently than simple addition.
naturallymitchell
changed the title
fix upstream markdown ambiguities
fix upstream markdown ambiguities, inconsistencies, and ordered listing antipatterns
Mar 7, 2019
needs: 1) feature complete structured writing, automatic list item numbering 2) unambiguous syntax 3) round-tripping between markup and markdown
numbering # for list ordering
portioning % for text sectioning, paragraphs
bulletting * for unordered listing
~~
raw notes:
~~
bug: ordered list syntax uses ambiguous, cumbersome, hardcoded symbols
https://spec.commonmark.org/0.28/#ordered-list-marker
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_coding (antipattern)
using unique, hardcoded characters for each list item, and then an ambiguous ending character is breaking my content. I'd like to change this syntax to a single character syntax.
the number sign,
#
, would make the most sense to me, since we're numbering things. this would make for an easy fix with nesting ordered lists, because then we could use multiple markers for list depth.related: # [ ]
~~
bug: heading syntax uses a number symbol, instead of a portion symbol
https://spec.commonmark.org/0.28/#atx-heading
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_sign
this bug also breaks numbering things. see []#
percentage is a portion calculated in terms of the rest of the portions, but it's the closest general character I can find to indicate a portion
the only other one I can think of is
+
a plus sign, but that's part of the problem I'm trying to solve. I would like to better organize content across documents for a combinatorial value whose mechanisms work differently than simple addition.~~
~~
~~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: