-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Address #256 #293
Address #256 #293
Conversation
@fromanirh Could you take a look at this please? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code per se looks fine and it is very much like how I'd solve this bug. I think we should have some (at least one) test to exercise the new code path though, also to prevent future regressions.
Signed-off-by: Tai Groot <tai@taigrr.com>
Signed-off-by: Tai Groot <tai@taigrr.com>
I am closing this PR since github doesn't let you change the name of the source branch for comparison and I now have multiple PRs. I'll reopen and reference this PR in the new one. |
If a disk has no partitions, common use cases for looping over partitions on the disk array created by Block.New() don't work as expected.
Now, underlying partition functions detect partitionless disks and treat a full-disk filesystem as a partition.
The Partition UUID is set to the empty string (since there isn't one), so this behavior can be detected.
This issue will resolve #256