Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

performance #50

Open
aoyanl opened this issue Feb 6, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

performance #50

aoyanl opened this issue Feb 6, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@aoyanl
Copy link

aoyanl commented Feb 6, 2021

Why is the result on the val set more than three points different from that published by the author? If I want to use it in my WSSS job，will it have a big impact？ Thanks！！
@isht7
Copy link
Owner

isht7 commented Feb 10, 2021 •
edited
Loading

What do you mean by WSSS job? I am not sure why there is the difference in performance, it is most possibly due several reasons including small changes in caffe compared to pytorch, and some implementation details not mentioned in the paper.

If performance is an issue for you, you can consider using deeplab v3+. This repository has an older version(deeplab v2).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@isht7 @aoyanl