Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stitching.merge_images doesnt have a dest_epsg argument #248

Open
scottstanie opened this issue Mar 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

stitching.merge_images doesnt have a dest_epsg argument #248

scottstanie opened this issue Mar 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@scottstanie
Copy link
Collaborator

Right now we can specify bounds, as well as the EPSG code of the bounds' coordinate system. But we can't say "reproject all these images into EPSG:XXXX".

# Make sure all the files are in the same projection.
projection = _get_mode_projection(file_list)

It always gets the most common projection of the inputs to use
Since this makes sense in a lot of cases, we should decide

  • do we want to add a dest_epsg argument so we can always force an output projection?
  • or should we just say "a user should to gdalwarp ... afterwards if they dont want the most common projection?
@scottstanie scottstanie added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Mar 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants