Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase selection of data output streams #272

Open
elfring opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Increase selection of data output streams #272

elfring opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@elfring
Copy link

elfring commented Oct 1, 2021

We got used to write some data into standard output (and standard error output) channels.
I suggest to increase the selection of output targets occasionally so that specific structures will be put into separate data streams (instead of displaying some information at the same place by default).

@iipeace
Copy link
Owner

iipeace commented Oct 1, 2021

Do you know -o option to save output to specific file?

@elfring
Copy link
Author

elfring commented Oct 1, 2021

This parameter refers only to a single output file, doesn't it?

@iipeace
Copy link
Owner

iipeace commented Oct 1, 2021

Yes! a file can be assigned to each thread.
What more channels do you need?
multiple files on same data? or sockets?

@elfring
Copy link
Author

elfring commented Oct 1, 2021

Another example:

  • In which stream should information be put about data loading for shared libraries?
  • Can each analysis report variant get redirected into a separate file?

@iipeace
Copy link
Owner

iipeace commented Oct 1, 2021

In which stream should information be put about data loading for shared libraries?

do you wanna function tracing data for specific actions such like shared library loading, garbage collection, process cleanup?

Can each analysis report variant get redirected into a separate file?

I don't have plan to support customized data format output now.

@elfring
Copy link
Author

elfring commented Oct 1, 2021

I imagine that area-specific output fine-tuning will become also interesting.

The imaginations will evolve further for the support of possible software extensions. 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants