-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 656
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alternative discovery mechanism #676
Comments
What about using a Well-Known URI? So it would always be I think this would be a great thing, but unfortunately it would probably be very difficult to get every provider to support it. |
That's a neat idea. I'd like that too! Wrt getting providers to adopt it: I hope oembed becomes important enough at some point that providers will WANT to support it, and I think it'd be great if it would not depend on a centralized directory anymore at that point. |
Really like the Instead I could try the well-known path and if that doesn't work scrape html also potentially for other meta tags, which I always wondered why do I need to parse HTML for all the meta tags, but it is what it is 😅 Apart from the well-known option I'd also be open for just |
Hi there,
I much appreciate the spec! Now I am wondering (and do let me know if this is an old discussion), if there is interest in an extension which would allow for a site-wide discovery mechanism. I.e. from what I can tell currently a provider can either
Now for my use case both are not feasible paths, because
So I was wondering if there would be interest in a spec extension for exposing sth similar to the
providers/manifest.yml
on a top-level (in a possibly CORS friendly way)?I'm not entirely sure yet how it'd look like, I guess the simplest version would be to serve a
oembed.json
on the root. I understand this is not the most backwards-compatible way, since it also infringes on web developers freedom to use all their routes to their liking.Then again with
sitemap.xml
orrobots.txt
, there is some precedence for hardcoded files, so it might actually be fine?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: