Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2021. It is now read-only.

x^y not implemented? #25

Open
akalongman opened this issue Jul 3, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

x^y not implemented? #25

akalongman opened this issue Jul 3, 2015 · 6 comments
Assignees
@Hywan
Labels
difficulty: medium in progress question

Comments

@akalongman
Copy link

akalongman commented Jul 3, 2015 •
edited by Hywan
Loading

x^y functionality not implemented?

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.
@Hywan Hywan added the question label Jul 5, 2015
@Hywan Hywan self-assigned this Jul 5, 2015
@Hywan
Copy link
Member

Hywan commented Jul 5, 2015

Nop. But pow can do the trick. Are you talking about the arithmetical grammar?

@akalongman
Copy link
Author

Yes, but in math expressions pow synonim is ^. Can you implement this functionality too?

@Hywan
Copy link
Member

Hywan commented Jul 7, 2015

Yes, sure.

/cc @hoaproject/hoackers that's an easy PR, any volunteers?

@osaris
Copy link
Member

osaris commented Jul 12, 2015

It means adding an alias in

Math/Visitor/Arithmetic.php

Line 343 in 7d15956

'pow' => xcallable('pow'),
to call pow when ^ is used ?

@akalongman
Copy link
Author

Yes, but format is other, script must parse x^z as pow(x, z)

@osaris osaris mentioned this issue Jul 12, 2015
Open
@osaris
Copy link
Member

osaris commented Jul 18, 2015

Label should not be "in progress" ?

@Hywan Hywan added in progress and removed ready labels Jul 21, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@Hywan Hywan

Labels
difficulty: medium in progress question
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@osaris @akalongman @Hywan