You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Result of #66.
To create nice stats the more index fields be typed as number (or even more accurate: date) the better.
See ES-docs for possible types. There is no need to change the format of the values e.g. of the field dateOfBirth - it seems to be sufficient to just configure the index to:
The problem is that many dates in lobid-gnd have non-date values (like [19XX], [?], [XXXX], [20.] etc., see dateOfBirth aggregation in http://lobid.org/gnd/search?q=*&format=json), which would cause indexing errors if they were set as date (I guess).
Correct, it would result in MapperParsingException, so we have to make sure that the value of date is valid. See hbz/lobid-resources#871 for details how this was done for lobid-resources.
Result of #66.
To create nice stats the more index fields be typed as
number
(or even more accurate:date
) the better.See ES-docs for possible types. There is no need to change the format of the values e.g. of the field
dateOfBirth
- it seems to be sufficient to just configure the index to:(https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/5.6/date.html)
I would say that all fields starting with
date
are reasonabledate_range
date
candidates.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: