Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rest defintions lack a group property so cannot be 'grouped' #333

Open
phantomjinx opened this issue Jun 9, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Rest defintions lack a group property so cannot be 'grouped' #333

phantomjinx opened this issue Jun 9, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
area/camel kind/enhancement Enhancements that don't necessarily result in a new feature

Comments

@phantomjinx
Copy link
Member

The RestDefinition class in camel lacks a group property. Since this is used as the property for grouping nodes then the routes generated by rest definitions get added to default. Maybe we can also group rest routes by using the tag property?

@tadayosi
Copy link
Member

@phantomjinx Is there any problem with just treating the REST routes as default group? Is it that we would have so many routes in the default practically when we wouldn't group them in some way like you suggested?

I'm wondering where it should be addressed. Rather than handling REST routes specially at Hawtio, shouldn't we raise a feature request to Camel so that it can add them to a group different from default?

@tadayosi tadayosi added kind/enhancement Enhancements that don't necessarily result in a new feature area/camel labels Jun 12, 2023
@tadayosi
Copy link
Member

@phantomjinx Is this already resolved or still an issue?

@lhein lhein moved this from New to Backlog in Kanban Board Apr 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/camel kind/enhancement Enhancements that don't necessarily result in a new feature
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants