Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove references to the Perma capture engine. #3653

Conversation

rebeccacremona
Copy link
Contributor

We removed Perma's own capturing code in #3434, but in a few places, left behind branches of logic specific to it. This PR removes those branches.

@rebeccacremona rebeccacremona requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2024 18:34
@rebeccacremona rebeccacremona requested review from teovin and removed request for a team November 13, 2024 18:34
@bensteinberg bensteinberg removed the request for review from teovin November 13, 2024 18:38
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.65%. Comparing base (ca2e800) to head (e73b98f).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3653   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    69.64%   69.65%           
========================================
  Files           54       54           
  Lines         7353     7351    -2     
========================================
- Hits          5121     5120    -1     
+ Misses        2232     2231    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rebeccacremona rebeccacremona merged commit 7230e0e into harvard-lil:develop Nov 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@rebeccacremona rebeccacremona deleted the remove-perma-capture-engine-checks branch November 15, 2024 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants