Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct handling for SwitchStatements without a containing Block #10027

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

niloc132
Copy link
Member

@niloc132 niloc132 commented Nov 2, 2024

Also fixed incorrect generics for related code, spotted while auditing other incomplete typechecks.

Fixes #10024

Also fixed incorrect generics for related code, spotted while auditing
other incomplete typechecks

Fixes gwtproject#10024
@niloc132
Copy link
Member Author

niloc132 commented Nov 2, 2024

@niloc132 niloc132 added this to the 2.13 milestone Nov 2, 2024
@niloc132 niloc132 merged commit 636db82 into gwtproject:main Nov 7, 2024
4 checks passed
niloc132 added a commit to niloc132/gwt that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
…project#10027)

Also fixed incorrect generics for related code, spotted while auditing
other incomplete typechecks.

Fixes gwtproject#10024
niloc132 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
)

Also fixed incorrect generics for related code, spotted while auditing
other incomplete typechecks.

Fixes #10024
See #10027
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using a switch statement together with if- or for-statement without using {} crashes
2 participants