Favor GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF over using actions: read to calculate the workflow path
#2126
Conversation
|
I can confirm that this fixes my issue from #2117 without the need to declare diff --git a/.github/workflows/local-cd.yml b/.github/workflows/local-cd.yml
index c6bf452..ee11bac 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/local-cd.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/local-cd.yml
@@ -236,7 +236,6 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: build-and-publish
permissions:
- actions: read
contents: read
packages: read
pull-requests: write
@@ -282,7 +281,8 @@ jobs:
id: upload-sarif
continue-on-error: true
if: hashFiles('sarif.output.json') != '' && github.event_name != 'pull_request_target'
- uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@main
+ uses: jsoref/github-codeql-action/upload-sarif@favor-workflow-ref
with:
sarif_file: sarif.output.json |
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
jsoref
force-pushed
the
favor-workflow-ref
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f8bd51a
to
b66391a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I had been planning to test something off of your forkmyself, but I haven't had time to in the last few days so I thought I'd ask if you were willing to test it and link the runs after testing 😄
We'd like to make sure that for reusable workflows, the workflow path we originally got from the API is definitely the same as the one we're getting from GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF. Basically, if they're not the same, alert categories will change after this change. They should be the same, but we'd like to be certain 😸
| @@ -119,6 +119,18 @@ | |||
| * Get the path of the currently executing workflow relative to the repository root. | |||
| */ | |||
| export async function getWorkflowRelativePath(): Promise<string> { | |||
| const workflow_ref = process.env["GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF"]; | |||
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Some environment variables may not exist in default setup workflows
jsoref
force-pushed
the
favor-workflow-ref
branch
from
1bd245e
to
4280b0e
Compare
|
@angelapwen: um, if someone gave me a workflow, I'm open to running it. I haven't managed to get reusable workflows to do anything particularly useful for me, so I don't generally use them myself (I think there are some reusable workflows somewhere in one of the codeql repositories) -- mostly they've made me dizzy (I tried to figure out a way to set up a reusable workflow for check-spelling, and it didn't seem to add any value). I have very little time tomorrow and won't have time until Tuesday (Monday's a holiday in Canada). I expect to be moderately busy next week, but I can generally run commands if people provide them. (Sorry, I have no idea how/why I missed your event this morning...) |
Introduced with GHES 3.9: https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.9/actions/learn-github-actions/variables GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF means that actions don't need to use `actions: read` to determine the path to the running workflow.
jsoref
force-pushed
the
favor-workflow-ref
branch
from
4280b0e
to
abe17b5
Compare
Changed according to github/codeql-action#2126
Introduced with GHES 3.9:
https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@3.9/actions/learn-github-actions/variables
GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REFmeans that actions don't need to useactions: readto determine the path to the running workflow.This should address the problem in #2117 as long as the user is running on GHES 3.9+ (including GHEC).
It doesn't precisely fix the issue because someone running on GHES 3.8 will still need to add
actions: readuntil #2121 makes that code path non fatal.Note that these aren't mutually exclusive PRs (although as they both impact the changelog, they will conflict there...) -- both changes should be applied -- this simplifies the general logic for the average user (and once GHES 3.8 is sunset, the other code path should be removed entirely).
Merge / deployment checklist