You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Much like Primer3 accepts a Path to the input FASTA, it would be more ergonomic if the class accepted a Path to a VCF instead of requiring the user to construct a VariantLookup.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have two VariantLookup objects and corresponding constructors: one is recommended for smaller VCFs and one is recommended for bigger VCFs. I'm envisioning that we could take a path to a VCF, determine the appropriate constructor, and construct the VariantLookup object under the hood.
@msto:
-do you agree with my thoughts above? Did I miss anything?
-if so, what do you think is the best way for us to check the given VCF path to see which constructor would be the appropriate one to call?
add to the Primer3 constructor, a list of VCFs, and a boolean flag (should we load into memory or query every time we need something?) -- the bool will trigger what variant lookup to build; but the default will be the disk-based one
Much like
Primer3
accepts aPath
to the input FASTA, it would be more ergonomic if the class accepted aPath
to a VCF instead of requiring the user to construct aVariantLookup
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: