In the same way as we need to use the special nested
query to gain access to
nested objects at search time, the dedicated nested
aggregation allows us to
aggregate fields in nested objects:
GET /my_index/blogpost/_search
{
"size" : 0,
"aggs": {
"comments": { (1)
"nested": {
"path": "comments"
},
"aggs": {
"by_month": {
"date_histogram": { (2)
"field": "comments.date",
"interval": "month",
"format": "yyyy-MM"
},
"aggs": {
"avg_stars": {
"avg": { (3)
"field": "comments.stars"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
-
The
nested
aggregation`steps down'' into the nested `comments
object. -
Comments are bucketed into months based on the
comments.date
field. -
The average number of stars is calculated for each bucket.
The results show that aggregation has happened at the nested document level:
...
"aggregations": {
"comments": {
"doc_count": 4, (1)
"by_month": {
"buckets": [
{
"key_as_string": "2014-09",
"key": 1409529600000,
"doc_count": 1, (1)
"avg_stars": {
"value": 4
}
},
{
"key_as_string": "2014-10",
"key": 1412121600000,
"doc_count": 3, (1)
"avg_stars": {
"value": 2.6666666666666665
}
}
]
}
}
}
...
-
There are a total of four
comments
: one in September and three in October.
A nested
aggregation can access only the fields within the nested document.
It can’t see fields in the root document or in a different nested document.
However, we can step out of the nested scope back into the parent with a
reverse_nested
aggregation.
For instance, we can find out which tags
our commenters are interested in,
based on the age of the commenter. The comment.age
is a nested field, while
the tags
are in the root document:
GET /my_index/blogpost/_search
{
"size" : 0,
"aggs": {
"comments": {
"nested": { (1)
"path": "comments"
},
"aggs": {
"age_group": {
"histogram": { (2)
"field": "comments.age",
"interval": 10
},
"aggs": {
"blogposts": {
"reverse_nested": {}, (3)
"aggs": {
"tags": {
"terms": { (4)
"field": "tags"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
-
The
nested
agg steps down into thecomments
object. -
The
histogram
agg groups on thecomments.age
field, in buckets of 10 years. -
The
reverse_nested
agg steps back up to the root document. -
The
terms
agg counts popular terms per age group of the commenter.
The abbreviated results show us the following:
..
"aggregations": {
"comments": {
"doc_count": 4, (1)
"age_group": {
"buckets": [
{
"key": 20, (2)
"doc_count": 2, (2)
"blogposts": {
"doc_count": 2, (3)
"tags": {
"doc_count_error_upper_bound": 0,
"buckets": [ (4)
{ "key": "shares", "doc_count": 2 },
{ "key": "cash", "doc_count": 1 },
{ "key": "equities", "doc_count": 1 }
]
}
}
},
...
-
There are four comments.
-
There are two comments by commenters between the ages of 20 and 30.
-
Two blog posts are associated with those comments.
-
The popular tags in those blog posts are
shares
,cash
, andequities
.
Nested objects are useful when there is one main entity, like our blogpost
,
with a limited number of closely related but less important entities, such as
comments. It is useful to be able to find blog posts based on the content of
the comments, and the nested
query and filter provide for fast query-time
joins.
The disadvantages of the nested model are as follows:
-
To add, change, or delete a nested document, the whole document must be reindexed. This becomes more costly the more nested documents there are.
-
Search requests return the whole document, not just the matching nested documents. Although there are plans afoot to support returning the best -matching nested documents with the root document, this is not yet supported.
Sometimes you need a complete separation between the main document and its associated entities. This separation is provided by the parent-child relationship.