-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Edgerouter X - not all interfaces are found after 2.1.1 #137
Comments
Just to add I'm seeing lots of log errors for openvpn: 2024-05-04 11:51:08.580 ERROR (MainThread) [custom_components.edgeos.data_processors.interface_processor] Failed to extract Interfaces data, Error: 'openvpn' is not a valid InterfaceTypes, Line: 105 Though if I monitor VTUN interfaces their stats seem to be okay. |
please provide diagnostic file so I will be able to analyze how it is configured, thanks |
Same issue:
Here is the diagnostic file : |
diagnostics attached. A little more information:
Thanks for sorting this, and this addon in general, its very helpful! :) |
released v2.1.3, |
Working as expected, thanks for the quick fix! |
Also correctly working now, thanks a lot ! |
With ER-X it is presenting all interfaces but for ER-12 it is only showing bond and vtun, all eth are missing. PS: did anyone above opened the json file which attached ? There are passwords for example for dynamic dns accounts without any encryption, also mac addresses and a lot of information which shouldn't be posted in public!!! |
please send me diagnostic file, you can send it directly to my mail (elad.bar@hotmail.com).
removed links from comments, thanks for raising it, will redact that data, if you can point me to a path in which it is available |
@dar3khudy thanks for the diagnostic file, |
pls check v2.1.4 |
Okay I've just tried it, and it is now only finding my 2 x VTUN interfaces,
none of the others, however I am getting an (hopefully) useful error
message:
2024-05-13 14:07:18.541 ERROR (MainThread)
[custom_components.edgeos.data_processors.interface_processor] Failed to
extract Interfaces data, Error: 'pseudo-ethernet' is not a valid
InterfaceTypes, Line: 105
So maybe it's getting to the PETH interface and stalling?
…On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 09:45, Elad Bar ***@***.***> wrote:
pls check v2.1.4
<https://github.com/elad-bar/ha-edgeos/releases/tag/v2.1.4>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#137 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQZVQ2DZVTDZPBCYXWU3QJTZCB4SDAVCNFSM6AAAAABHGXOVISVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMBWHE4TGMRYGI>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
it's not an actual error but warning, it means that the intergation will ignore that interface, need to move it to debug message, it means that devices that are: loopback or their name starts with: imq, npi, lo - will be ignored by intentionally. interfaces that are not matching to any of the criteria above, will be ignored and the message is coming to serve when trying to understand the reason why it is not supported... if you think interfaces are missing, please send me the diagnostic file over an email to elad.bar@hotmail.com thanks |
Thanks, yes it's finding less interfaces than before, not even the switch
interfaces, I'll send you the diagnostics.
…On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 14:29, Elad Bar ***@***.***> wrote:
it's not an actual error but warning, it means that the intergation will
ignore that interface, need to move it to debug message,
it should present the following interfaces:
considered as: ethernet, bridge, switch, openvpn, wireguard
name starts with: pppoe, vtun, bond
it means that devices that are: loopback or their name starts with: imq,
npi, lo - will be ignored by intentionally.
interfaces that are not matching to any of the criteria above, will be
ignored and the message is coming to serve when trying to understand the
reason why it is not supported...
if you think interfaces are missing, please send me the diagnostic file
over an email to ***@***.***
thanks
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#137 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQZVQ2EE375SVYJPAUJH4B3ZCC55NAVCNFSM6AAAAABHGXOVISVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMBXGU4DINJYG4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
@dar3khudy you are using v2.1.3, it was fixed in v2.1.4 corrected mention :) |
@benjycov can you please remove it, restart and add it again, |
|
Okay, I tried removing, rebooting and re-adding. Same problem.
I have another site with 3 more Edgerouters which i tried, the two routers
with PETH interfaces failed to configure, found the VTUN interfaces then
stopped. I removed the PETH interface from one of the routers, re-added it
and straight away it worked and completed setup.
So it is definitely the PETH interfaces causing the problem, you can add a
PETH interface to any ETH interface, such as:
pseudo-ethernet peth1 {
address 192.168.100.252/24
description "Starlink Management"
link eth1
}
So it should be easy to replicate.
Also I then noticed that it isn't adding sub interfaces of switch
interfaces anymore, it only finds switch0 but not switch 0.1, etc.
…On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 16:14, Elad Bar ***@***.***> wrote:
@benjycov <https://github.com/benjycov> can you please remove it, restart
and add it again,
something wrong over there generated lots of empty devices, i suspect it
has something to do with it
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#137 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQZVQ2D5VNFX6JCAR3RWYXDZCDKHDAVCNFSM6AAAAABHGXOVISVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMBXHE2DQNBVHE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Found it, it seems that it's not working as i described, it fails the process if the type is not available, |
added fix in v2.1.5 |
v2.1.5 for me is working fine ! thank you. |
@benjycov pls let me know if now it works for you as well thanks |
Hi,
Just tried 2.1.6, and still 2 problems:
1) Routers with Peth interfaces only find the VTUN interfaces then no
others. I've deleted, rebooted and readded.
2) Routers (ER-X) with a switch interface only show switch0 and none of the
sub interfaces.
Sorry!
…On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 14:43, Elad Bar ***@***.***> wrote:
@benjycov <https://github.com/benjycov> pls let me know if now it works
for you as well
thanks
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#137 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQZVQ2F35FXPUVMMIC3KPH3ZCIIJXAVCNFSM6AAAAABHGXOVISVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJQGI4DGMJTGM>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Can you pls send me again over the mail diagnostic file and logs with v2.1.6? Sub interfaces are not supported, i need to learns it's structure and functionality before exposing it in HA |
I will email it through in a moment.
Re sub interfaces, apologies I thought we had these before, but actually
now I realise we didn't.
…On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 15:50, Elad Bar ***@***.***> wrote:
Can you pls send me again over the mail diagnostic file and logs with
v2.1.6?
Thank you for assisting fixing the issue, sorry it takes time :)
Sub interfaces are not supported, i need to learns it's structure and
functionality before exposing it in HA
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#137 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQZVQ2D6WEDBTIGATQNFDYLZCIQDTAVCNFSM6AAAAABHGXOVISVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJQGQ2DQMRUGE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
ha-edgeos v2.1.8 not detecting vlan interfaces. At least 1 previous version was working, but now none of the vlan interfaces (SWITCH0.10, etc) are being detected. |
With 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 I have had to delete my original routers and readd.
I have 2 Edgerouter 12s, and both are discovering all of their interfaces okay. I have 1 Edgerouter X and only the switch and vtun interfaces are being found, no eth interfaces.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: