Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📝 (Upgrade): Created UPGRADE_NOTES.md and documented changes in #3974 #3982

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Coduz
Copy link
Contributor

@Coduz Coduz commented Mar 1, 2024

This PR creates a UPGRADE_NOTES.md file which is supposed to report all PR which requires some attention when upgrading to the current version

Related Issue
This PR is a integration of changes made in #3974

Description of the solution adopted
Added and created UPGRADE_NOTES.md file

Screenshots
None

Any side note on the changes made
None

@Coduz Coduz added the Documentation Doc... What?? Joke! We will write some! label Mar 1, 2024
@Coduz Coduz requested a review from stefanomorson March 1, 2024 16:39
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.87%. Comparing base (21d4941) to head (2c97630).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #3982   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      16.87%   16.87%           
  Complexity        10       10           
==========================================
  Files           1989     1989           
  Lines          51791    51791           
  Branches        4420     4420           
==========================================
  Hits            8739     8739           
  Misses         42648    42648           
  Partials         404      404           

@Coduz Coduz marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2024 10:56
@Coduz Coduz force-pushed the fix-clientIdCaseSentisiveUpgradeNotes branch 2 times, most recently from a497c25 to f7254fe Compare March 13, 2024 09:40
@Coduz Coduz force-pushed the fix-clientIdCaseSentisiveUpgradeNotes branch from f7254fe to 462bff9 Compare March 14, 2024 14:02
@Coduz Coduz force-pushed the fix-clientIdCaseSentisiveUpgradeNotes branch from 462bff9 to 3958c36 Compare March 22, 2024 16:37
@Coduz Coduz force-pushed the fix-clientIdCaseSentisiveUpgradeNotes branch from 3958c36 to 2c97630 Compare April 4, 2024 14:30
…se#3974

Signed-off-by: Alberto Codutti <alberto.codutti@eurotech.com>
@Coduz Coduz force-pushed the fix-clientIdCaseSentisiveUpgradeNotes branch from 2c97630 to 1c1f05d Compare May 3, 2024 15:02
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.87%. Comparing base (1efbcd7) to head (2c97630).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Current head 2c97630 differs from pull request most recent head 1c1f05d. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1c1f05d to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #3982      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      16.78%   16.87%   +0.08%     
  Complexity        10       10              
=============================================
  Files           1987     1989       +2     
  Lines          51835    51791      -44     
  Branches        4422     4420       -2     
=============================================
+ Hits            8702     8739      +37     
+ Misses         42730    42648      -82     
- Partials         403      404       +1     

see 67 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Doc... What?? Joke! We will write some!
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants