-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Keep tool maintained and put into practice #2
Comments
Hey @chrwm I totally agree with you - My short answer to this is: Let's move this to the OEFamily. I already talked to David about this on his last day at RLI and (I think) he agreed. The long answer: There is the oep-client, which should become THE tool for all users. Since this tool here already uses the oep_client, we would have to redesign the code a bit, I suppose. The benefit would be that we provide a clean interface and bundle the functionality of our multiple tools into one. Looking at the list of features this tool here offers, some of them would also be useful if made available via the OEP UI, e.g. Users should be able to download a collection of data. The Databus also offers a function to create a collection, which could lead to conflicts in the future. But since we don't have something like this in the OEP, I would still like to have it available. To summarise, I think this tool is great and we want to have it in the OEF. Nevertheless, we need to consider whether some functions are already fully or at least parts of it available elsewhere and also group functions (e.g. everything related to download/upload). |
Hey @ all, |
Hey again, I have invited you to the Open Energy Family org. on GitHub. You should have received an email. You are free to decide if you want to add this tool to the collection :) You receive admin rights for this repository so that you continue to have full control. Later on we can decide where we want to use this tool. |
Hi David, I'd like to keep your great work alive and put the code in practice. I'd also like to add a feature in the future.
To do so, I think as we discussed already in the meeting, when you presented the tool, the best way would be to move it into the OEFamily or RL-institut organisation. Let me know what you think.
@jh-RLI @nesnoj Where would be the better place you think?
In my opinion the OEFamily.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: