You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So far (S)NLE and NPE ony support discrete NFs, while a separate class FMPE is needed for continuous NFs. Also there is currently no way to use CNFs with NLE.
It would be better in the long run to have a flexible NLE/NPE class that can take any density estimator. This would violate the current naming conventions in the literature, but this generalized view is a bit more reasonable imho.
We could then flexibly use
Continuous flows using the rectified flow and flow matching losses
Discrete flows such as the (block) neural autoregressive flows
Consistency (flow) models and derivations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So far (S)NLE and NPE ony support discrete NFs, while a separate class FMPE is needed for continuous NFs. Also there is currently no way to use CNFs with NLE.
It would be better in the long run to have a flexible NLE/NPE class that can take any density estimator. This would violate the current naming conventions in the literature, but this generalized view is a bit more reasonable imho.
We could then flexibly use
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: