-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable --progress-total option using pv. #547
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the MR, looks promising. I've had a brief look at it, and did not have time to test it yet (I'm quite busy at the moment, this might take a while sorry).
Do you have any numbers on how good are the estimates are and how long it takes to calculate the diffs? I'm especially curious as the btrfs send-stream adds quite some metadata.
btrbk
Outdated
my @cmd = ( "pv" ); | ||
push @cmd, ("-s", $total_len); | ||
push @cmd, "-e -r -p -i 2"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you check if mbuffer
supports similar functionality? I'd hate to re-introduce pv
as a new dependency, even if optional.
see 9dc717c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mbuffer
does not support this unfortunately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mbuffer
without -q
has a progress bar that runs by default that looks like this:
in @ 24.0 MiB/s, out @ 24.0 MiB/s, 4352 MiB total, buffer 100% full
Although, if pv
has a progress bar that better shows up in log files, like when systemd is what manages btrbk, then that's a big plus.
btrbk
Outdated
sub sub_diff($$) { | ||
# | ||
# calc snapshot diff (btrfs find-new) | ||
# | ||
my $src_vol = $_[0]; | ||
my $target_vol = $_[1]; | ||
|
||
# NOTE: in some cases "cgen" differs from "gen", even for read-only snapshots (observed: gen=cgen+1) | ||
my $lastgen = $src_vol->{node}{gen} + 1; | ||
|
||
# dump files, sorted and unique | ||
my $ret = btrfs_subvolume_find_new($target_vol, $lastgen); | ||
|
||
INFO "Listing changed files for subvolume: $target_vol->{PRINT} (gen=$target_vol->{node}{gen})"; | ||
INFO "Starting at generation after subvolume: $src_vol->{PRINT} (gen=$src_vol->{node}{gen})"; | ||
INFO "Listing files modified within generation range: [$lastgen..$target_vol->{node}{gen}]"; | ||
DEBUG "Newest file generation (transid marker) was: $ret->{transid_marker}"; | ||
my $files = $ret->{files}; | ||
my $total_len = 0; | ||
foreach my $name (sort keys %$files) { | ||
my $finfo = $files->{$name}; | ||
$total_len += $finfo->{len}; | ||
} | ||
|
||
INFO "Total size: " . print_size($total_len) ; | ||
|
||
return $total_len; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could get similar (same? better?) results by using the results from btrbk extents
, which might have some advantages:
- faster (?) (note: installing module "IO::AIO" gives quite some speedup!)
- has caching capabilities (!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It don't know, I haven't used btrbk extents
so far. This is just a copy of the part run by btrbk diff
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a must or still debatable?
Speed-wise it was pretty fast / negligible compared to the transfer time for all my cases. |
Another general comment: |
594fc6d
to
dac6350
Compare
Any update / further requests for the PR? |
I'd suggest updating the --progress entry: A man entry should be added too. Note that there wasn't any commit here since August 2023, so digint is probably busy. It would be nice to show total progress even for the initial snapshot, at least if quotas are enabled (otherwise it can be pretty slow to compute for HDDs with lots of data). Still, it's pretty useful already. |
Add a
--progress-total
option that internally runsbtrbk diff
first to get a total size to be transferred (per target). This option is an alternative to--progress
and shows aETA
time estimate as well as progress bar viapv
.Aims to resolve #543 .