You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see that "Sound" has been chosen as the object, under which musical audio would fall. I do think that it would be valuable to have some mechanism that would allow the distinction between musical and non-musical recordings. This is a distinction that is encoded in standard library cataloging, for example.
Of course, things can get difficult when considering things like recordings of half-sung poetry, sound art field recordings, etc, but the fundamental difference between musical and non-musical recordings is still so dominant that I think a practical ability to distinguish between the two is essential.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From Nick Patterson:
I see that "Sound" has been chosen as the object, under which musical audio would fall. I do think that it would be valuable to have some mechanism that would allow the distinction between musical and non-musical recordings. This is a distinction that is encoded in standard library cataloging, for example.
Of course, things can get difficult when considering things like recordings of half-sung poetry, sound art field recordings, etc, but the fundamental difference between musical and non-musical recordings is still so dominant that I think a practical ability to distinguish between the two is essential.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: