OOPS! test is failing for some important pitfalls

[nishad]

The current namespace RDF ¹ fails for OOPS pitfalls ² 10,30,34. Please fix the issues if they are relevant to this namespace. Also, for the record please respond to this issue thread with a rebuttal or any actions taken.

Footnotes

1. https://dcmi.github.io/openwemi/ns/openWEMI.ttl ↩

2. https://oops.linkeddata.es/catalogue.jsp ↩

[kcoyle]

10 - missing disjointness - this is deliberate, and a key fact of OpenWEMI
30 - equivalent classes - we don't have any, so this is ok
34 - missing declaration of rdfs/owl:Class - I can't find this. Does the test give more information?