You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Attempting an upgrade to dagster 1.9.2 raises error here despite my dagster.yaml configuring the run launcher as outlined in current documentation
What did you expect to happen?
No breaking ECSRunLauncher changes when upgrading. Since underlying image is specified on my ECS task def (and controlled via CICD process), I'd expect dagster to use image defined on task def.
How to reproduce?
For ECS launchers configured like documentation outlines, attempt kicking off a run.
All dagster resources are deployed to an ECS cluster
Additional information
No response
Message from the maintainers
Impacted by this issue? Give it a 👍! We factor engagement into prioritization.
By submitting this issue, you agree to follow Dagster's Code of Conduct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have a PR to roll back the check I added that is causing the error; but tracing through the code it's unclear to me that this will actually fix the issue. It seems like image is being pulled from the job's repository_origin, and it seems like run_task_kwargs needs image to be non-None . There's a lot of infra to set up to be able to test this, I'm hoping @treilly1 will be able to test my changes with their existing infra if possible
What's the issue?
1.9.2
raises error here despite mydagster.yaml
configuring the run launcher as outlined in current documentationWhat did you expect to happen?
ECSRunLauncher
changes when upgrading. Since underlying image is specified on my ECS task def (and controlled via CICD process), I'd expect dagster to use image defined on task def.How to reproduce?
Dagster version
1.9.2
Deployment type
Other Docker-based deployment
Deployment details
Additional information
No response
Message from the maintainers
Impacted by this issue? Give it a 👍! We factor engagement into prioritization.
By submitting this issue, you agree to follow Dagster's Code of Conduct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: