More comprehensive error handling on tweet creation #261
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThe PR improves error handling during tweet creation by adding specific error detection and raising appropriate exceptions when the API response contains error information. Sequence diagram for tweet creation error handlingsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Client
participant API
User->>Client: create_tweet()
Client->>API: Send tweet creation request
API-->>Client: Response with errors
alt Errors in response
Client->>Client: raise_exceptions_from_response()
Client->>User: Throw CouldNotTweet exception
else No errors
Client->>User: Return success
end
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the error handling capabilities of the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @0xCurtis - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- There's unreachable code in the error handling - the second raise statement after raise_exceptions_from_response() will never be executed
- Please provide more context in the PR description about what specific error cases this change is meant to handle better
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
twikit/client/client.py (1)
1241-1241: Useinoperator directly with dict instead of.keys()For better readability and slightly improved performance, use
inoperator directly with the dictionary instead of calling.keys().-if 'errors' in response.keys(): +if 'errors' in response:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
1241-1241: Use
key in dictinstead ofkey in dict.keys()Remove
.keys()(SIM118)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
twikit/client/client.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
twikit/client/client.py
1241-1241: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
| if 'errors' in response.keys(): | ||
| raise_exceptions_from_response(response['errors']) | ||
| raise CouldNotTweet( | ||
| response['errors'][0] if response['errors'] else 'Failed to post a tweet.' | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Simplify error handling logic and fix potential KeyError
The current error handling has redundant logic and could raise a KeyError if response['errors'] is empty. Consider simplifying the logic and adding a safe default.
-if 'errors' in response.keys():
- raise_exceptions_from_response(response['errors'])
- raise CouldNotTweet(
- response['errors'][0] if response['errors'] else 'Failed to post a tweet.'
- )
+if 'errors' in response:
+ errors = response['errors']
+ raise_exceptions_from_response(errors)
+ error_message = errors[0]['message'] if errors else 'Failed to post a tweet.'
+ raise CouldNotTweet(error_message)Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
1241-1241: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()
Remove .keys()
(SIM118)
Currently the error we get is broad
Summary by Sourcery
Bug Fixes:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes