You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Was having this debate during a submission today. Do y'all have opinions?
My reasoning was to apply the same rationale as runtime vs run-time vs run time: type check when type is modifying the verb check, type-check when acting as a phrase modifying something else such as type-checking algorithm, and never typecheck.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Here is my feeling on this: one first has to make a judgment call about whether the verb is type-check or typecheck. I don't know the answer to this; it depends on how far down the road of language drift we are. This style guide should probably stake an opinion one way or another but we haven't yet. But after that:
If you chose the closed version, typecheck, it's always typecheck. Typechecking, typechecker, etc., etc.
If you chose the hyphenated version, then definitely type-checking algorithm, but what about this program does not type check or type-check? I guess probably the open version, but it's weirder than run time because it's a verb instead of a noun.
So I guess this answer is not much more useful than, like, 🤷♀️.
Was having this debate during a submission today. Do y'all have opinions?
My reasoning was to apply the same rationale as runtime vs run-time vs run time:
type check
whentype
is modifying the verbcheck
,type-check
when acting as a phrase modifying something else such astype-checking algorithm
, and nevertypecheck
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: