How about adding the type of resource?

[abstraktor]

Motivation

The resources seem to fall into particular categories, round about these:

• Videos
• Text tutorials and blogs
• Text documentation
• Research Papers
• Book recommendations
• Communication (Slack / Twitter)

It would be helpful to assess the links to get a hint on what format it has.

Once we agreed on any of these, I'd volunteer to change that.

Ideas

Idea 1: Category roots

We could have the categories as list roots in the Resource paragraph.

Idea 2: Technical Format in the link text, more categories for

I found a similar list from jetbrains here. They seem to put the technical format in the link text. Their paragraph structure looks useful for identifying the group first that I'm interested in.

[dslmeinte]

Sorry for opening this up, but I like this suggestion. Also: what's the precise difference between the "Awesome MPS" and "Build with MPS" (which should be 'built') categories?