fix: No need in the Builder::add_resource taking ownership of the resource stream; use reference instead
#479
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@mauricefisher64 @gpeacock The vulnerability failure appears after merging the latest |
scouten-adobe
changed the title
Builder::add_resource taking ownership of the resource stream; use reference insteadBuilder::add_resource taking ownership of the resource stream; use reference instead
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes in this pull request
Give a narrative description of what has been changed.
Previously, the
Builder::add_resourcemethod takes ownership of the resource stream. This is unnecessary and taking the stream as a reference allows for the stream to be used over and over again between calls (especially in long running processes).The method also required the stream to be seekable, but this isn't necessary either as the stream is read into a memory buffer.
Checklist
TO DOitems (or similar) have been entered as GitHub issues and the link to that issue has been included in a comment.