-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 252
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix different formatting of msvc runtime value conan_provider.cmake #613
base: develop2
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Bobini1
Thanks for your contribution.
It would be good to understand where this value comes from. The values that there are already defined are the canonical/standard ones by CMake, it is not very clear where a different value comes from and what could be other potential implications.
Yes, I understand. This is a proposition that solves the problem for me. It is probably worth investigating why I have it in the first place. Unfortunately, I don't think I know how to find that out. Do you think you could help me check why I have this problem? What can I do? |
I would like to add that my CMake's version is 3.26.4. |
Maybe the first thing that we could try to rule out is something that would be specific to a custom toolchain file or CMakeLists.txt file. Does it fail for you with a very straightforward Second thing would be to double check the CLion configuration, to see if there could be some specific configuration related to the build-types that could be affecting. |
I have recently reproduced this issue with Visual Studio (not with CLion like OP). Versions: I have an explicit dependency on
The
The value of
This is exactly the value Merging this PR would help greatly for using conan_provider with Visual Studio. @memsharded What do you think? |
Hi @Danleb Thanks for your info
I am a bit confused by this. The |
I meant the |
This is what I don't understand, the @Danleb maybe in your case this could be the problem:
If you define this in your |
Thanks for the explanation. Yes, I have a "consumer" case. I really liked the approach with transparent integration to CMake in Conan1, so I replicated it by As I found, the In my case, the |
Ok, sounds good, but please recall that the |
No description provided.