Suggested owner should provide a confirmation from the owning team #52
Comments
|
We also discussed about the rationale to be in main sometimes not being as clear, especially if requests come from teams further away from Ubuntu development. I'll add text for that as well. |
cpaelzer
added a commit
to cpaelzer/ubuntu-mir
that referenced
this issue
Mar 6, 2024
We had this to some extend, but it was shown that it isn't clear enough yet so we decided we want to spell it out and require a comment by a representative of the owning team. Fixes: canonical#52 Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Cases like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tree/+bug/2056099 are great.
But they come at a risk of misunderstanding as discussed on Tue 5th March 2024.
We'd want the rules to express that is anyone requesting an MIR, and suggests another team to own it.
They should work with them to have that team post a comment on the bug to be ok to take ownership.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: