Modelling ducted fans

[agrewalks]

Congratulations on this very versatile and powerful framework! Can the Actuator Surface Model be used to define a duct around a fan?
Thanks

[CFD-designs]

There is some mention of a ducted fan example in the instructions, but I couldn't see the code for it anywhere or how it was generated.

[EdoAlvarezR]

Hi Anant!

I did a proof of concept simulating a shrouded rotor with the wing actuator surface model (ASM) in this simulation: LINK. However, I didn't feel like this was the appropriate model to capture the effects of a surface in very close proximity to the blade tips, so I moved forward doing validation (perhaps the wing ASM could still be used to roughly capture some effects).

Instead, we developed a new ASM using a panel method which we showed in the AVIATION 2023 paper: [Video] [Paper]. This model works well for ducted fans, but more development and validation is still underway. That work is currently in the flowpanel_prototype branch. If you are interested in helping the development and validation process, we could send you the scripts that run the simulations shown in the paper for you to start running your own simulations.

[CFD-designs]

The paper is pretty cool.
The issue though is that this approach requires manual specification of the separation points, which is why the upper body is not giving accurate results compared to the lower body.
With regard to rotor gap, is there any scaling used or adaptive mesh like some LBM solvers?

[EdoAlvarezR]

I think you might be right.

Regarding the blade tip gap, the gap is directly defined by the geometry that the user gives (it's simply the spacing between the rotor diameter and the duct inner diameter at that station). However, the duct is inviscid and there's still a lot of validation to do to understand the limitations of this type of model.

[ilm71]

Hi Ed,

would you mind to send me the scripts mentioned for the simulation of the ducted fans? I am currently trying to simulate rotor-structure-interactions roughly with FLOWUnsteady to cover the aerodynamic effects. I have already adjusted my code by sticking to the shown scripts in the flow-panel prototype branch, but in my opinion there are currently issues in terms of that the rotor downwash still penetrates the structure volume.
Thanks!

[EdoAlvarezR]

Related to #144

[Burning1997]

Hi Ed,

Would you be able to share the scripts you mentioned for the simulation of ducted fans? I’m currently working on simulating rotor-structure interactions, particularly using FLOWUnsteady to capture the aerodynamic effects.

Thanks so much in advance!

[kont1901]

Hi Alvarez,
Thanks for your discussions on ducted rotor. I am also interested in these models described in your paper ( AVIATION 2023 paper) as Dr. Anant mentioned. It is a very good paper. Is it possible to share your models on the duct and on the duct-rotor coupling?
Thanks
Charly

[agrewalks]

Hi Ed, My colleague Tenon Charly Kone and I would like to help with the development and validation of a ducted rotor model. You had mentioned that would be willing to share the scripts used to run the ducted rotor sims in your 2023 AIAA Aviation paper “Vortex Particle Method for Electric Ducted Fan in Non-Axisymmetric Flow.” That would be a great place to start. We will familiarize ourselves with the script ad we can follow up with a virtual meeting. Regards Anant From: Ed Alvarez ***@***.***> Sent: August 17, 2023 6:18 PM To: byuflowlab/FLOWUnsteady ***@***.***> Cc: Grewal, Anant ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [byuflowlab/FLOWUnsteady] Modelling ducted fans (Discussion #75) ***Attention*** This email originated from outside of the NRC. ***Attention*** Ce courriel provient de l'extérieur du CNRC. Hi Anant! I did a proof of concept simulating a shrouded rotor with the actuator surface model (ASM) in this simulation: LINK<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf4pIt7oi5k> . However, I didn't feel like this was the appropriate model to capture the effects of a surface in very close proximity to the blade tips, so I didn't even bothered in doing validation (perhaps ASM could still be used to roughly capture some effects). Instead, we developed a new ASM using a panel method which we show in the AVIATION 2023 paper: Video<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebOW4aLGlMA>Paper<https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7676&context=facpub>. This model works well for ducted fans, but more development and validation is still underway. That developments is in the flowpanel_prototype branch<https://github.com/byuflowlab/FLOWUnsteady/tree/flowpanel-prototype>. If you are interested in helping the development and validation process, we could send you the scripts that run the simulations shown in the paper for you to start running your own simulations. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#75 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMRMH4OA3W4B45UCIQJ3VNLXV2KBHANCNFSM6AAAAAAZPSTB7M>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>

[EdoAlvarezR]

@kont1901 @agrewalks, it would be great if you guys could help validating the ducted fan model. I believe there's great potential using panels for the duct and actuator line for the rotor as shown in the paper (unfortunately, I have been busy with other things at work after the AVIATION 2023 paper).

@cibinjoseph recently picked up the ducted fan model to continue working towards a journal paper. Perhaps we can do a collaboration jumping together in the same paper.

I'll send you my email over LinkedIn to continue the conversation through email.