Skip to content

Unexpected bond dimension #126

Answered by hczhai
Shovan-Physics asked this question in Q&A
Sep 24, 2024 · 1 comments · 3 replies
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Thanks for reporting this problem. The value returned from mps.info.get_max_bond_dimension() is incorrect.

As a workaround, you can add an argument full_fci=False to driver.get_random_mps, then mps.info.get_max_bond_dimension() will behave correctly.

This will be fixed in version 0.5.3rc19 so that mps.info.get_max_bond_dimension() will print the correct value with or without full_fci=False.

Replies: 1 comment 3 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
3 replies
@Shovan-Physics
Comment options

@hczhai
Comment options

@Shovan-Physics
Comment options

Answer selected by Shovan-Physics
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants