Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate with OpenDEX for Bitcoin-to-Crypto Trading #277

Closed
kilrau opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Integrate with OpenDEX for Bitcoin-to-Crypto Trading #277

kilrau opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
an:idea https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/182#issuecomment-596599174 re:processes was:stalled

Comments

@kilrau
Copy link

kilrau commented Oct 30, 2020

This is a Bisq Network proposal. Please familiarize yourself with the submission and review process.

@initCCG brought up the idea to integrate trading on OpenDEX within the bisq app. Feasible? Definitely. But admittedly not trivial and not a small feat. I am putting this out here as an early-stage proposal to get early feedback from the bisq community.

How I see it, there are several ways how to go about it:

  1. Implement the OpenDEX protocol directly in the bisq java stack, package the minimum necessary swap clients into the bisq app: lnd(light) + connext(light)
  2. Use an existing OpenDEX implementation, packaged within within the bisq app along with necessary lnd(light) + connext(light) swap clients
  3. Merely provide bisq users with instructions how to externally set up an OpenDEX environment and allow connecting to & visual control+trading of such environment through the bisq app.
@MwithM MwithM added an:idea https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/182#issuecomment-596599174 re:processes labels Oct 31, 2020
@lavinger
Copy link

I like the idea. Using atomic swaps would be an upgrade from today version of Bisq. This looks like a good idea for another iteration of Bisq, not just an incremental update.

@kilrau
Copy link
Author

kilrau commented Nov 3, 2020

More comments, especially on the 3 options outlined are highly appreciated!

@LeadManPL
Copy link

3rd option will be too difficult for most users.

@pazza83
Copy link

pazza83 commented May 9, 2021

Hi @kilrau thanks for the proposal. I am doing some housekeeping on the proposals. Please can you take steps to move this forward or alternatively close the proposal.

Many thanks.

Ref: https://bisq.wiki/Proposals

@pazza83
Copy link

pazza83 commented May 31, 2021

Closing as stalled, looks like the idea of collecting user data is acceptable if it can stay anonymous.

@kilrau you might want to consider re-submitting the proposal at a future date with more information, context and objectives.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
an:idea https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/182#issuecomment-596599174 re:processes was:stalled
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants