You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a helm deployment fails because of a timeout, which often happens for the first deployment on a new cluster because image pulls can take a long time, the first deployment will be listed as FAILED. When running hubploy again, Error: UPGRADE FAILED: "ooi-staging" has no deployed releases will always occur because there is no successful deployment. The only solution is do delete the deployment entirely, and try again. Do we see any way of identifying this situation and rather than trying an upgrade which will certainly fail, deploying again?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just tried the delete-rerun-workflow sequence, and of course instead of the no deployed releases error, got the classic timed out waiting for the condition. So getting a deployment going on a new cluster involves a delete-try-again-cross-fingers-repeat program which I feel could somehow be better. Any ideas on how I might make this work better? Worth noting, once one deployment is in, that changes everything because an upgrade can theoretically work.
We can add the --force option to the upgrade, and in that case it will try to install over the top of the first failed release. are there downsides to adding this option to the helm upgrade command?
When a helm deployment fails because of a timeout, which often happens for the first deployment on a new cluster because image pulls can take a long time, the first deployment will be listed as FAILED. When running hubploy again,
Error: UPGRADE FAILED: "ooi-staging" has no deployed releases
will always occur because there is no successful deployment. The only solution is do delete the deployment entirely, and try again. Do we see any way of identifying this situation and rather than trying an upgrade which will certainly fail, deploying again?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: