Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Long reads genome guided #76

Open
sagnikbanerjee15 opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Long reads genome guided #76

sagnikbanerjee15 opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@sagnikbanerjee15
Copy link

Hello,

I have implemented RNA-Bloom on a subset of the PacBio bulk transcriptomic data and achieved the expected results. However, I noticed that some steps in RNA-Bloom take a considerable amount of time to execute. Before running RNA-Bloom on the entire dataset, I'd like to discuss potential methods to speed up the execution.

One idea is to align the reads to the genome, extract the aligned reads from specific non-overlapping regions of the reference, and then supply those to RNA-Bloom. Essentially, I am considering adopting the genome-guided strategy used by Trinity. Do you think this approach could help accelerate the process? Additionally, would adjusting certain parameters be beneficial since we wouldn't need to compare all reads to each other anymore?

Thank you

@kmnip kmnip self-assigned this Aug 7, 2024
@kmnip kmnip added the question Further information is requested label Aug 7, 2024
@kmnip
Copy link
Collaborator

kmnip commented Aug 7, 2024

Hi @sagnikbanerjee15 ,

I haven't used Trinity's genome-guided strategy. It would definitely help reduce total runtime and peak memory usage if the input reads were partitioned based on alignments against a reference genome. I don't think you need to change any assembly parameters for these localized assemblies.

Hope that answers your questions!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants