You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, in the “Cortical morphological network (CMN) construction” of your published lecture, you refered that both right and left hemispheres for each subject. And with DesikanKilliany Atlas based parcellation, each can be divded into 35 meaningful region. I think for now, we have 70 ROIs in total. However, when computing the morphological connectivity, you said "we generate a connectivity vector of size $N_c = N_r ×(N_r −1)/2$, (i.e., 595 connectivities for $N_r = 35$)". It's that means we can get a 595-dim vector for each hemisphere and there existing an omitting concatenation procedure to form an 1190-dim vec, or its just an example the final dimension of connectivity vector is $70*(70-1)/2=2415$?
Hoping for your reply, thanks sincerely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, in the “Cortical morphological network (CMN) construction” of your published lecture, you refered that both right and left hemispheres for each subject. And with DesikanKilliany Atlas based parcellation, each can be divded into 35 meaningful region. I think for now, we have 70 ROIs in total. However, when computing the morphological connectivity, you said "we generate a connectivity vector of size$N_c = N_r ×(N_r −1)/2$ , (i.e., 595 connectivities for $N_r = 35$ )". It's that means we can get a 595-dim vector for each hemisphere and there existing an omitting concatenation procedure to form an 1190-dim vec, or its just an example the final dimension of connectivity vector is $70*(70-1)/2=2415$ ?
Hoping for your reply, thanks sincerely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: