-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong amplify.state references nodejs runtime instead of python for lambda functions #258
Comments
Marking this issue as stale due to inactivity. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If this issue receives no comments in the next 7 days it will automatically be closed. |
Still present |
Marking this issue as stale due to inactivity. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If this issue receives no comments in the next 7 days it will automatically be closed. |
Will drop the PR if i don't get any response @tawoyinfa . I know maintining a project is a lot of work. But i don't want to get a notification all 30 days anymore, that the issue is going to be closed. |
Describe the bug
A few lambda functions located in
amplify/backend/function/
reference in theiramplify.state
file a nodejs provider but are actually python functions. Seeamplify/backend/function/teamgetPermissions/amplify.state
for exampleTo Reproduce
Expected behavior
The
amplify.state
files are aligned with the actual codebase.Additional context
Might not be relevant for a deployment but will surely backfire on local development such as running
amplify mock
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: